Natalie Ledbetter / LGA — fit snapshot

Outbound. Mina-initiated. Dual-track package: customer (LGA uses LeedAB) + partner (LGA refers Series A/B founders to LeedAB). Site read informs everything below — she's a solo fractional People Ops operator for Series A/B startups (Bubble.io, Wallaroo.ai, Stash, Virtual Sapiens). NYC. Brand voice: "no decks, no theory, just real fixes, fast."

Profile snapshot

BrandLedbetter Global Advisory (LGA)
PersonNatalie Ledbetter — fractional Head of People / org-design advisor
Operating modelSolo. Embeds in client teams. No backing firm or partners.
ICP (her side)Series A/B founders, ~30-150 employees, "execution breaks before strategy does"
Notable clientsBubble.io · Wallaroo.ai · Virtual Sapiens · Stash
ChannelCalendly discovery call (primary CTA on every page)
Brand tellsAnti-deck · anti-theory · anti-HR-theater · operator-first · "leverage over programs"

Why this lands (or doesn't)

What we have going for us

What could kill it

Three motive hypotheses (rank-ordered)

hyp 01 · most likely

She's bandwidth-constrained. Solo operators in advisory hit a billable-hours ceiling fast. Anyone who runs a portfolio of engagements has wished for "an ops layer that wasn't another tab." We're a credible answer. Listen for: how much non-billable admin she does in a week, what tabs are open right now, whether she's turned down work this quarter.

hyp 02 · plausible

She wants a tool to recommend, not just diagnose. "I find the problem, here's the playbook" is a common advisor pain — clients want her to also DO the thing, but she's a fractional. Pointing them at LeedAB is doing-the-thing-by-proxy. Listen for: how often a diagnostic finds an ops gap she can't fill, whether she has tools she points clients at today.

hyp 03 · long shot

She's curious about productisation for her own brand. "What if my framework was a system, not a deck?" — every fractional eventually wants leverage that scales beyond their hours. We could be a substrate she runs HER methodology on top of. (Risky path — opens the "white-label / your-name-on-our-thing" conversation we explicitly closed in the public fit.html.) Listen for: any language about "scaling beyond billable" / "building IP" / "what comes after fractional."

Discovery questions (10-15 min)

  1. "What's the most-repeated week in your year — what does the calendar look like?" — surfaces bandwidth pain without leading.
  2. "When a diagnostic finds something you don't fix, where does it usually go?" — opens the referral hypothesis.
  3. "Of your current engagements, how many have ops infrastructure problems vs. pure org-design?" — sizes the partner opportunity.
  4. "What tools do you point founders at today?" — competitive baseline + how she handles recommendations.
  5. "If we could vanish 6 hours of admin a week, what would those hours go to?" — value framing for angle 01.
  6. "What's a bad referral feel like to you?" — surfaces what would make her NOT pass clients to us.

Hard nos (round one)

Stay in line with how we framed Pillarix + Rome. Don't cave on:

Commercial preference (revisit after first call)

Posture for the first call

Match her brand voice. Anti-deck. No "let me walk you through our 31-agent system." Lead with: "Want to ask three questions about how you currently run LGA before I tell you anything about us — sound good?" Then listen. The pitch is in her answers, not in our slides.

Founders making the call: Mina runs it. Muiez observes. Don't pitch the partner angle on the first call unless she opens it — we want to validate angle 01 (her own use) first.

Open actions (Mina)

Internal · LeedAB · 2026-05-04 · Generated for Mina + Muiez only · External pages: /index, /overview, /fit (separate Cloudflare project, random suffix)